遠々洛外
  • 遠々洛外のブログ - Far Beyond the Miyako Blog

The protracted and increasingly difficult subject of submarines

17/2/2015

 
PictureJon Kudelka, The Australian, 18 February 2015
Over the past two weeks, media outlets and think tanks in Australia have engaged in a wide ranging and sometimes heated debate about what Australia should do about its future fleet of submarines. This debate has extended to examining what issues Japan faces should Australia decide to pursue what is known in defence circles as “Option J” – i.e., the purchase of 12 (or possibly 8) Soryu class submarines. In an article for the Lowy Interpreter, Rikki Kersten outlined the obstacles to any such deal facing Shinzo Abe, not least of which would be objections from the New Komeito to any action that would upset its voting base. At the same time, the message from the Australian government that it would pursue a “competitive evaluation process”, and all of the confusion that this expression created, had commentators from Hugh White to Greg Sheridan ($) agreeing that perhaps Australian PM Tony Abbott had already made a choice on submarines, that Japan was the likely benefactor, and that this raised all sorts of troubling questions about funding, strategy, and international relations, not forgetting to mention Australia’s future military and industrial capabilities.

Former Australian Senator Graham Richardson went one step beyond with his op-ed on Friday last week, declaring that he had information from a “very reliable source” that a secret agreement existed between Japan and Australia whereby Australia would purchase submarines from Japan in exchange for Japan signing the FTA (or EPA depending on which side of the Pacific you stand) with Australia in July last year. This appeared to be nothing more than mischief making on behalf of Richardson, but it sent analysts into a flurry of activity speculating on whether such an agreement did exist, and what it would mean for the Abbott government should it be brought to light.

A more important point was made, I think, by Brendan Nicholson in an op-ed for the Australian newspaper on Thursday last week. Nicholson pointed out that while much of the dialogue about submarines and Japan’s involvement has centred around job losses in Adelaide, even if Australia only assumes responsibility for the maintenance of the new submarines, this work will require the same if not a larger submarine workforce. In other words, rather than resulting in fewer jobs, it will bring far more jobs to Adelaide, and be a sustainable industry in South Australia for the next 30 to 40 years.

Yet this message appears to have gotten lost somewhere in the commentary on the submarine choice (video). Chief of the Australian Defence Force, Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin, himself said on Tuesday this week that the issue on submarines is not whether they should be built in Australia or not, but whether they can be sustained here.

The politicisation of the issue has, however, ensured that any arguments for the economic benefits of a sustainment program will be countered by claims of secret deals and of Australia surrendering its sovereignty to the US (who is reported to be behind the push for Japan to sell submarines to Australia). The ALP has declared that it is standing up for Australian industry in demanding both a competitive tender process and an Australian build and sustainment program, but economic arguments make a far more compelling case for an overseas build/Australian sustainment program.

It is by no means clear, it should be noted, that the Abbott government even intends to have the submarines built overseas. While former Australian Defence Minister David Johnston stated that the Abbott government would seek the best deal for Australia, and that a local build was therefore not guaranteed because of a need to mitigate risk, nowhere was there a categorical refusal to countenance Australian involvement in the submarine construction process.

If work on the replacement submarines is centred around South Australian shipyards, as both Johnston and Tony Abbott said it would be, then who is to say that this isn’t precisely what the Australian government intends? While it is true that the project might not involve the ASC (Australian Submarine Corporation), a semi-government institution charged with maintaining the current Collins class submarine (and which has been blamed for many of the problems that beset the Australian naval shipbuilding industry), the ASC is but one company making use of Techport Australia. Furthermore, if any overseas company wins the new submarine build contract, the ASC facility could be sold off or transferred to this foreign company. It has happened before – note BAE Systems ownership of the Williamstown shipyards outside Melbourne – and could very well happen again.  

Yet the question of whether the politics of any submarine deal can survive the partisanship now on display can only be answered by an unequivocal statement from the government, and there's little chance of that coming before the release of the defence white paper at some point later this year. So prepare thyself for many more months of speculation, rumour, and denial.


Comments are closed.

    Author

    This is a blog maintained by Greg Pampling in order to complement his webpage, Pre-Modern Japanese Resources.  All posts are attributable to Mr Pampling alone, and reflect his personal opinion on various aspects of Japanese history and politics (among other things).

    弊ブログをご覧になって頂きまして誠に有難うございます。グレッグ・パンプリングと申します。このブログに記載されている記事は全て我の個人的な意見であり、日本の歴史、又は政治状態、色々な話題について触れています。

    Categories

    All
    Disasters 災害
    Edo Period 江戸時代
    Japan Australia Relations 日豪関係
    Japanese Politics 日本の政治
    Japan Korea Relations 日韓関係
    Kamakura Period 鎌倉時代
    Meiji Period 明治時代
    Miscellaneous 雑学
    Muromachi Period 室町時代
    Regional Politics 地域の政治
    Regional Politics 地域の政治
    Second World War 太平洋戦争
    Sengoku Period 戦国時代

    Archives

    January 2023
    January 2022
    December 2021
    August 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    July 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

    RSS Feed

© 2023 www.farbeyondthemiyako.com. All Rights Reserved.